The Debate · Kenya
Restitution and Apology
Restitution means trying to repair a historical wrong: through apology, compensation, returning stolen property, or telling the truth about what happened. In Kenya, the debate covers colonial abuses, land, stolen objects and injustices committed after independence.
For decades, Britain denied or downplayed abuses during the Mau Mau Emergency. In 2009, five elderly survivors, including Jane Muthoni Mara and Wambugu wa Nyingi, sued the British government in London. During the case, it emerged that thousands of colonial files had been secretly removed from Kenya at independence and hidden in Britain. These 'migrated archives' were revealed in 2011.
The High Court allowed the case to go ahead, and in June 2013 Foreign Secretary William Hague announced a settlement: £19.9 million shared among 5,228 survivors, and a statement of 'sincere regret'. It was not a formal apology, and Britain did not admit legal liability. A memorial to the victims, funded by Britain, opened in Uhuru Park in 2015.
Not everyone benefited. In 2018, a further case brought by around 40,000 Kenyans was dismissed because the judge ruled that too much time had passed for a fair trial. In 2023, King Charles III visited Kenya and spoke of his 'greatest sorrow and the deepest regret', but again did not apologise.
Objects are part of the story too. Museums in Europe hold thousands of Kenyan objects taken during colonial rule, and since 2018 the International Inventories Programme has been mapping where they are. The Nandi have campaigned for the return of the remains and regalia of Koitalel arap Samoei; in 2006 his sacred staffs came home.
Kenya has also faced its own record. The Truth, Justice and Reconciliation Commission reported in 2013 on abuses from 1963 to 2008, and in 2015 President Uhuru Kenyatta apologised for past injustices. But many of its recommendations, including reparations, have not been carried out.
Timeline
- 1963
Thousands of colonial files secretly removed from Kenya at independence.
- 2003
Kenya lifts its ban on the Mau Mau movement.
- 2005–06
Koitalel's sacred staffs traced in Britain and returned to the Nandi.
- 2009
Mau Mau survivors sue the British government.
- 2011
'Migrated archives' revealed during the case.
- Jun 2013
UK settlement: £19.9m to 5,228 survivors and a statement of 'sincere regret'.
- 2013
Kenya's Truth, Justice and Reconciliation Commission publishes its report.
- Mar 2015
President Uhuru Kenyatta apologises for historical injustices.
- Sep 2015
Memorial to victims of colonial abuse unveiled in Uhuru Park.
- 2018
Claims by around 40,000 Kenyans dismissed on grounds of delay; International Inventories Programme launched.
- 2023
King Charles III expresses 'the deepest regret' in Nairobi, without apology.
Key words
- Restitution
- Repairing a historical wrong through apology, compensation, return of property or truth-telling.
- Compensation
- Payment for loss or injury.
- Memorial
- A structure built to commemorate people or events.
- Apology
- An acknowledgement of wrongdoing that accepts responsibility, as opposed to an expression of regret.
- Migrated archives
- Colonial records secretly removed to Britain at independence and revealed in 2011.
- Reparations
- Measures to repair harm, including payments, services, land or public acknowledgement.
- Truth commission
- An official body set up to investigate and record past abuses.
People
Koitalel arap Samoei
Nandi leader killed in 1905 whose remains and regalia the Nandi seek to bring home.
Jane Muthoni Mara
Survivor of detention and one of the claimants who won the 2013 settlement.
Wambugu wa Nyingi
Mau Mau detainee and lead claimant in the case against Britain.
William Hague
UK Foreign Secretary who announced the 2013 settlement.
King Charles III
Expressed 'the deepest regret' for colonial violence on his 2023 visit to Kenya.
Uhuru Kenyatta
President who apologised for historical injustices in 2015.
The Debate
Regret or apology?
Britain expressed 'sincere regret' in 2013 and King Charles spoke of 'the deepest regret' in 2023, but neither offered a formal apology. Governments avoid apologies partly because they can imply legal liability. Survivors argue that without full acceptance of responsibility, regret is not enough.
Discussion prompt
Britain expressed 'regret' but did not 'apologise'. Why do you think the choice of word mattered so much to both sides?
Quiz time
1. What were the 'migrated archives'?
2. In 2013, Britain made a formal apology and admitted legal liability.
3. Why was the 2018 case dismissed?
4. Which Kenyan body reported in 2013 on abuses after independence?
5. What did King Charles III express in Nairobi in 2023?
How this connects
Caused by
Current topic
Restitution and Apology
Compensation, archives and stolen artefacts.
Answer every quiz question correctly above to mark this sub-topic complete.